'Verizon wireless boasts 'America's fastest 4G network'
Of all the confusing technology terms used in consumer marketing today, perhaps the most opaque is '4G,' used to describe a new, much faster generation of cellular data on smartphones, tablets and other devices. It sounds simple, but there are many varieties of 4G and conflicting claims.
AT&T claims 'The nation's largest 4G network,' and T-Mobile says it has 'America's largest 4G network.' Verizon Wireless boasts 'America's fastest 4G network,' and Sprint says it had the first 4G network.
Yet the technology used by T-Mobile, and mostly comprising AT&T's 4G network, isn't considered 'real' 4G at all by some critics, and the one used by Sprint has proven to be a dead end and is being abandoned. The flavor being used by Verizon is now being adopted by its rivals, but won't be interoperable among them.
It's a headache for consumers to grasp. So here's a simplified explainer to some of the most common questions, based on interviews with top technical officials at all four major U.S. wireless carriers.
What is 4G?
It's the fourth and latest generation technology for data access over cellular networks. It's faster and can give networks more capacity than the 3G networks still on most phones. There's a technical definition, set by a United Nations agency in Europe, and a marketing definition, which is looser, but more relevant to most consumers.
Who needs 4G?
It's mostly for people with smartphones, tablets and laptops who often need fast data speeds for Web browsing, app use and email when they're out of the range of Wi-Fi networks. It can give you the same or greater data speeds as home or office Wi-Fi when you're in a taxi. In hotels and airports, it's often faster than public Wi-Fi networks.
How does 4G differ from another term being advertised,'LTE'?
LTE, which stands for 'Long Term Evolution.' is the fastest, most consistent variety of 4G, and the one most technical experts feel hews most closely to the standard set by the U.N. In the U.S., it has primarily been deployed by Verizon, which offers it in over 200 markets. AT&T has begun deploying it, offering LTE in 28 markets so far. Sprint and T-Mobile are pivoting to LTE, though they have no cities covered by it yet.
What are these other versions of 4G?
Sprint uses a technology called WiMax. T-Mobile and AT&T deployed a technology called HSPA+, a faster version of 3G that they relabeled as 4G, and which many technical critics regard as a 'faux 4G.' Sprint will begin switching to LTE later this year, and T-Mobile in 2013.
How fast is 4G?
Claims vary and performance depends upon the type of device, location, and time. In my tests, 4G phones, tablets and data modems for laptops typically deliver from three to 20 times the download speeds of 3G devices. The speed king is LTE. The LTE devices I've used have typically averaged download speeds of between 10 and 20 megabits per second, with frequent instances of over 30 megabits per second. The other forms of 4G have generally produced download speeds well under 10 mbps in my tests. But all of these are better than 3G, which in my tests on all networks and many devices, averages download speeds of under 2 mbps.
Who has the biggest 4G network in the U.S.?
Even if you accept all the carriers' definitions of 4G, it's hard to tell. Carriers measure their networks differently -- sometimes by the number of people to whom it is theoretically available, and sometimes by the number of cities and markets, which can be defined differently. Verizon has the largest LTE network. Both AT&T and T-Mobile claim the biggest 4G network, but the first has a limited LTE deployment and the second has none.
Does LTE work overseas?
Yes, but there is less LTE rollout going on overseas than in the U.S. So, in most countries, your shiny new American LTE device may wind up falling back to slower networks.
~ MY Style is revolutionary and ever changing,No one can question. By Dedicated and the Testify man called Sylvester Lai^
Saturday, 21 April 2012
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
Steve Chen co-founder of YouTube.
Steve Chen Co-Founder of YouTube.
BIOGRAPHY STEVE CHEN – Steven Shih “Steve” Chen born August, 1978) is a Taiwanese American and a co-founder and previous Chief Technology Officer of the popular video sharing website YouTube.
Chen was born in Taipei, Taiwan. When he was eight years old, he and his family immigrated to the United States. Before moving to America, he studied at Ching Shin Elementary School, Taiwan for two years. He attended River Trails Middle School in Mt. Prospect, Illinois and later John Hersey High School and Illinois Math and Science Academy, later attending University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Business
He was an early employee at PayPal, where he met Chad Hurley and Jawed Karim. In 2005, the three founded YouTube. He currently holds the position of Chief Technology Officer at YouTube. Chen was also an early employee at Facebook, although he left after several months to start YouTube.[citation needed] In June 2006, Chen was named by Business 2.0 as one of “The 50 people who matter now” in business.
On October 16, 2006, Chen and Hurley sold YouTube to Google, Inc. for $1.65 billion. Chen received 625,366 shares of Google and an additional 68,721 in a trust as part of the sale. The Google shares that he received were worth $350 million at Google’s October 30, 2007 closing stock price.
YouTube's Payoff: Hundreds of Millions for the Founders (2007)
Everyone suspected that the investors, founders and early employees of YouTube made tidy sums when the video sharing site was acquired by Google for $1.65 billion in stock.
But until now, few knew just how tidy those sums were. The answer, which Google delivered in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is now in: The sums are big enough to spark a new wave of envy across Silicon Valley.
The acquisition, the biggest in Google’s history, put the Internet search giant in the leading position in the burgeoning world of online video. But the acquisition has been clouded by threats that Google could be sued by movie studios and other content owners over the proliferation of copyrighted material on the YouTube site.
Steve & Chad Hurley
The Youngsters Behind YouTube: The Early Years of Chad Hurley and Steve Chen.
“Everybody aspires to be a star,” says Steve Chen, a Taiwanese immigrant who came to the U.S. with his family in the hopes for a better life. Chen’s aspirations became a reality when he, along with Pennsylvania-born Chad Hurley created what is today the world’s largest online video website. YouTube, having been launched no more than two years ago has now become a global sensation, propelling both Hurley and Chen to the top of Business 2.0’s list of “The 50 People Who Matter Now.” YouTube was also named TIME magazine’s 2006 “Invention of the Year.” When Hurley and Chen decided to sell their company, they did so for a hefty price tag of $1.65 billion.
BIOGRAPHY STEVE CHEN – Steven Shih “Steve” Chen born August, 1978) is a Taiwanese American and a co-founder and previous Chief Technology Officer of the popular video sharing website YouTube.
Chen was born in Taipei, Taiwan. When he was eight years old, he and his family immigrated to the United States. Before moving to America, he studied at Ching Shin Elementary School, Taiwan for two years. He attended River Trails Middle School in Mt. Prospect, Illinois and later John Hersey High School and Illinois Math and Science Academy, later attending University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Business
He was an early employee at PayPal, where he met Chad Hurley and Jawed Karim. In 2005, the three founded YouTube. He currently holds the position of Chief Technology Officer at YouTube. Chen was also an early employee at Facebook, although he left after several months to start YouTube.[citation needed] In June 2006, Chen was named by Business 2.0 as one of “The 50 people who matter now” in business.
On October 16, 2006, Chen and Hurley sold YouTube to Google, Inc. for $1.65 billion. Chen received 625,366 shares of Google and an additional 68,721 in a trust as part of the sale. The Google shares that he received were worth $350 million at Google’s October 30, 2007 closing stock price.
YouTube's Payoff: Hundreds of Millions for the Founders (2007)
Everyone suspected that the investors, founders and early employees of YouTube made tidy sums when the video sharing site was acquired by Google for $1.65 billion in stock.
But until now, few knew just how tidy those sums were. The answer, which Google delivered in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is now in: The sums are big enough to spark a new wave of envy across Silicon Valley.
The acquisition, the biggest in Google’s history, put the Internet search giant in the leading position in the burgeoning world of online video. But the acquisition has been clouded by threats that Google could be sued by movie studios and other content owners over the proliferation of copyrighted material on the YouTube site.
Steve & Chad Hurley
The Youngsters Behind YouTube: The Early Years of Chad Hurley and Steve Chen.
“Everybody aspires to be a star,” says Steve Chen, a Taiwanese immigrant who came to the U.S. with his family in the hopes for a better life. Chen’s aspirations became a reality when he, along with Pennsylvania-born Chad Hurley created what is today the world’s largest online video website. YouTube, having been launched no more than two years ago has now become a global sensation, propelling both Hurley and Chen to the top of Business 2.0’s list of “The 50 People Who Matter Now.” YouTube was also named TIME magazine’s 2006 “Invention of the Year.” When Hurley and Chen decided to sell their company, they did so for a hefty price tag of $1.65 billion.
Thursday, 12 April 2012
North Korea's Rocket Blows Up; Draws Ire.
North Korea's multistage rocket launch failed, and parts crashed into the Yellow Sea off South Korea, drawing international ire at Pyongyang's defiance.
Monday, 9 April 2012
For Google, All Eyes on 'Costs Per Click'
When Google Inc.GOOG-0.45 % reports earnings on Friday, many pundits might pick right up where they left off one quarter ago: With concerns about prices advertisers are paying to get attention in the Internet giant's dominant search engine.
Google, of Mountain View, Calif., issued a fourth-quarter report in January that largely fell flat on Wall Street, as profit came in well below expectations. During a subsequent conference call, executives were peppered with questions about an 8% decline in prices paid by advertisers during the period every time a user clicked on their ads.
In particular, analysts wanted to know if growing use of Google on mobile devices—where so-called costs per click can be lower—played a role. At one point, Chief Financial Officer Patrick Pichette half-joked that he would take any question not about costs per click.
But critics are unlikely to let the issue go. A report published last month by Marin Software underlines some reasons for concern. It showed that the percentage of clicks that Google sees on paid-search ads in mobile devices will grow sharply this year—to 25%, though prices paid for those clicks will stay lower than on desktop computers.
Increased demand is a good thing for Google, but it also means the company must make up for declining prices with more volume.
"As you shift from PC to mobile, there're just so many more clicks," said Anthony DiClemente, an analyst covering Google for Barclays. "That has broad ramifications for the pricing and volume of Google's fundamental business.
" Search remains far and away Google's core business, despite its forays into areas including social networking and mobile software. As Google is pulled alongside its peers further into mobile devices such as phones and tablets, it must continue to make its economics work for shareholders.
In January, Google executives said there had been a number of reasons for the decline in prices paid for clicks, noting that more clicks on Google ads is a good thing, even if it does lower prices for advertisers.
"More clicking," Mr. Pichette reasoned, is "actually a pretty healthy environment."
Google also is expected to shed some light Thursday on things other than its core search business, such as the Google+ social network that it unveiled last summer. Chief Executive Larry Page already has dropped some related news, writing in an open letter posted on his Google+ page Thursday that the social network now has "well over 100 million users." That compares with 90 million Google+ users disclosed by the CEO when the company posted earnings in January.
In October, the company said it had about 40 million users.
Thursday, 5 April 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)